Coordination Chemistry Reviews

8.1k papers and 725.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.1k papers published in Coordination Chemistry Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 725.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Coordination Chemistry Reviews usually cover Materials Chemistry (3.3k papers), Inorganic Chemistry (2.8k papers) and Organic Chemistry (2.7k papers) specifically the topics of Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (1.0k papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (996 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (919 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Coordination Chemistry Reviews are W. J. Geary, Glen B. Deacon, K. Kalyanasundaram, Philip A. Gale, Maria C. DeRosa, Koen Binnemans, Bernard Valeur, B. J. Hathaway, Iwao Omae and Eric S. Raper.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Coordination Chemistry Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Coordination Chemistry Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Coordination Chemistry Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Coordination Chemistry Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coordination Chemistry Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025