Countries where authors publish in Annales Polonici Mathematici
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annales Polonici Mathematici. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annales Polonici Mathematici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annales Polonici Mathematici more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Annales Polonici Mathematici
This network shows the impact of papers published in Annales Polonici Mathematici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annales Polonici Mathematici.
About Annales Polonici Mathematici
The 2.2k papers published in Annales Polonici Mathematici in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Annales Polonici Mathematici usually cover Applied Mathematics (1.4k papers), Geometry and Topology (738 papers) and Numerical Analysis (386 papers) specifically the topics of Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (344 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (290 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (288 papers), Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (238 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (229 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (203 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (191 papers) and Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (191 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annales Polonici Mathematici are W. Janowski, Z. Opial, A. W. Goodman, Józef Sičiak, Andrzej Lasota, David Minda, Wancang Ma, Czesław Olech, D. Willett and Marek Kuczma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.