Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Andrzej Lasota
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrzej Lasota's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrzej Lasota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrzej Lasota more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrzej Lasota. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrzej Lasota. The network helps show where Andrzej Lasota may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrzej Lasota
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrzej Lasota.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrzej Lasota based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrzej Lasota. Andrzej Lasota is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lasota, Andrzej. (2015). Ergonomic Evaluation of Physical Risk for Packing Line Operators. Logistics and Transport. 26(2). 11–20.1 indexed citations
2.
Lasota, Andrzej, et al.. (2014). Working postures of operators in the pipe production process : a case study. Logistyka. 14417–14423.3 indexed citations
3.
Lasota, Andrzej. (2014). A reba-based analysis of packers workload: a case study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.21 indexed citations
4.
Lasota, Andrzej. (2014). Obciążenie układu mięśniowo – szkieletowego operatorów w procesie produkcji części samochodowych.1 indexed citations
5.
Lasota, Andrzej. (2014). ANALYSIS OF PACKERS\\' WORKLOAD ON THE PACKING LINE - A CASE STUDY. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.9 indexed citations
6.
Lasota, Andrzej, et al.. (2014). Ryzyko i obciążenie statyczne operatorów wiertarek stołowych. Logistyka. 904–909.3 indexed citations
7.
Lasota, Andrzej. (2013). Packer’s Workload Assessment, Using the OWAS Method. Logistics and Transport. 18(2). 25–32.9 indexed citations
8.
Lasota, Andrzej. (2010). Czy media są nowe? Próba polemiki. Studia Medioznawcze. 169–177.
Lasota, Andrzej & J. Myjak. (2002). On a dimension of measures. Bulletin of The Polish Academy of Sciences Mathematics. 50(2). 221–235.13 indexed citations
12.
Lasota, Andrzej & J. Myjak. (1998). Semifractals on Polish spaces. Bulletin of The Polish Academy of Sciences Mathematics. 46(2). 179–196.20 indexed citations
Lasota, Andrzej & James A. Yorke. (1981). The law of exponential decay for expanding mappings. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova. 64. 141–157.8 indexed citations
15.
Lasota, Andrzej. (1979). Invariant measures and a linear model of turbulence. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova. 61. 39–48.25 indexed citations
16.
Lasota, Andrzej & Franciszek Hugon Szafraniec. (1975). On Hammerstein integral equations. 59. 65–67.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.