Countries where authors publish in Science China Mathematics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science China Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science China Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science China Mathematics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Science China Mathematics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Science China Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science China Mathematics.
About Science China Mathematics
The 2.1k papers published in Science China Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Science China Mathematics usually cover Mathematical Physics (739 papers), Applied Mathematics (815 papers) and Geometry and Topology (605 papers) specifically the topics of Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (224 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (199 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (193 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (171 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (161 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (149 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (147 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (146 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science China Mathematics are Vincent Giovangigli∥, Xianhua Tang, Dachun Yang, Minbo Yang, Fashun Gao, Yongsheng Song, Guanggui Ding, Jianshe Yu, Zhan Zhou and Dongyi Wei.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.