Anesthesiology Clinics

910 papers and 13.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 910 papers published in Anesthesiology Clinics in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Anesthesiology Clinics usually cover Surgery (426 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (361 papers) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (229 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (322 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (155 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anesthesiology Clinics are William M. Armstead, Peter Gerner, Richard D. Urman, Jens Lohser, Alan D. Kaye, Frederick E. Sieber, Robert Simon, Ronald L. Dufresne, Peter E. Rivard and Daniel B. Raemer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anesthesiology Clinics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anesthesiology Clinics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anesthesiology Clinics.

Countries where authors publish in Anesthesiology Clinics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anesthesiology Clinics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anesthesiology Clinics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anesthesiology Clinics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025