Countries where authors publish in Annals of Intensive Care
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Intensive Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Intensive Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Intensive Care more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Annals of Intensive Care
This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Intensive Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Intensive Care.
About Annals of Intensive Care
The 1.4k papers published in Annals of Intensive Care in the last decades have received a total of 39.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Annals of Intensive Care usually cover Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (479 papers), Emergency Medicine (305 papers) and Nephrology (159 papers) specifically the topics of Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (371 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (337 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (253 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (236 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (216 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (108 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (90 papers) and Acute Kidney Injury Research (89 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Intensive Care are Paul E. Marik, Jean–Louis Teboul, Daniel A. Lichtenstein, Xavier Monnet, Antoine Vieillard‐Baron, Élie Azoulay, Bertrand Guidet, Antonio Artigas, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain and Rinaldo Bellomo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.