American Literary Realism

204 papers and 114 indexed citations

About

The 204 papers published in American Literary Realism in the last decades have received a total of 114 indexed citations. Papers published in American Literary Realism usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (133 papers), History (84 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (22 papers) specifically the topics of American and British Literature Analysis (78 papers), American Literature and Humor Studies (68 papers) and American Sports and Literature (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Literary Realism are Stephanie A. Smith, Donald Pizer, Ann Marie Ryan, Susan K. Harris, Emily I. Dolan, Henry B. Wonham, Amanda Adams, Michelle Kohler, Robert C. Clark and Geoffrey C. Williams.

In The Last Decade

American Literary Realism

37 papers receiving 48 citations

Fields of papers published in American Literary Realism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Literary Realism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Literary Realism.

Countries where authors publish in American Literary Realism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Literary Realism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Literary Realism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Literary Realism more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026