American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

484 citations
318 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism 15
    • Themes in Literature Analysis 8
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 7
    • American and British Literature Analysis 6
    • Narrative Theory and Analysis 6
    • Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 5
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 5

American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

57 papers receiving 86 citations

Peers

American book review/˜The œAmerican book review
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Literature and Literary Theory 83
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 32
  • Business and International Management 8
  • Cultural Studies 28
  • Ecology 84
Replace NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin with:
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin Germany
Law Culture and the Humanities United States
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences China
Space and Culture India India
eTropic electronic journal of studies in the tropics Australia
Historia Chile
Cahiers des Amériques latines France
Narodna umjetnost Croatia
Varia Historia Brazil
Places United States
American book review/˜The œAmerican book review relative to NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin Germany NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American book review/˜The œAmerican book review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review.

About American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

The 318 papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review in the last decades have received a total of 484 indexed citations . Papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (57 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (10 papers), Cultural Studies (13 papers), Philosophy (16 papers) and History (7 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (15 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (8 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (8 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (7 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (6 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (5 papers) and Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (5 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review are Mary Beth Miller, Graeme Macdonald, Andrea Scarpino, Thomas H. March, Bruce Robbins, Rita Felski, Jennifer Wenzel, Ursula K. Heise, Daniel J. Leary and Jayna Brown.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact