American Studies in Scandinavia

231 papers and 285 indexed citations i.

About

The 231 papers published in American Studies in Scandinavia in the last decades have received a total of 285 indexed citations. Papers published in American Studies in Scandinavia usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (54 papers), Sociology and Political Science (49 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (27 papers) specifically the topics of Race, History, and American Society (15 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (12 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Studies in Scandinavia are Jon Gjerde, David E. Nye, Geir Lundestad, Ulf Lie, Marko Modiano, Thomas B. Byers, Mikael Börjesson, Stein Haugom Olsen, Gary B. Ostrower and Mikkel Jensen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in American Studies in Scandinavia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Studies in Scandinavia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Studies in Scandinavia.

Countries where authors publish in American Studies in Scandinavia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Studies in Scandinavia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Studies in Scandinavia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Studies in Scandinavia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025