Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w62748449 →Countries where authors are citing Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement
This map shows the geographic impact of Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement
This network shows the impact of Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement.
About Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement
This paper, published in 2007, received 776 indexed citations . Written by Kwang Suk Yoon, Teresa Duncan, Silvia Wen‐Yu Lee, Beth A. Scarloss and Kathy L. Shapley covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (646 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (205 citations) and Information Systems and Management (87 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w62748449.