Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model
- Journal
- The Journal of Higher Education
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/1981125 →Countries where authors are citing Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model
This map shows the geographic impact of Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model
This network shows the impact of Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model.
About Predicting Freshman Persistence and Voluntary Dropout Decisions from a Theoretical Model
This paper, published in 1980, received 391 indexed citations . Written by Ernest T. Pascarella and Patrick T. Terenzini covering the research area of Software and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (317 citations), Social Psychology (91 citations) and Safety Research (63 citations). Published in The Journal of Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1981125.