Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)

1.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2021, received 1.3k indexed citations. Written by Justin Paul, Weng Marc Lim, Aron O’Cass, Andy Wei Hao and Stefano Bresciani covering the research area of Marketing and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (418 citations), Sociology and Political Science (341 citations) and Strategy and Management (261 citations). Published in International Journal of Consumer Studies.

Countries where authors are citing Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Accurate secondary structure prediction and fold recognition for circular dichroism spectroscopy Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper One-Dimensional Constitutive Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys: Thermomechanical Derivation with Non-Constant Material Functions and Redefined Martensite Internal Variable Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Generation of superoxide anion by the NADH dehydrogenase of bovine heart mitochondria Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper APP Processing and Synaptic Function Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Isolated Single-Cycle Attosecond Pulses Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Retinal Vascular Layers Imaged by Fluorescein Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Rankless by CCL
2026