Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
- Authors
- David RonPeter Walter
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nrm2199 →Countries where authors are citing Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
This map shows the geographic impact of Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
This network shows the impact of Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response.
About Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
This paper, published in 2007, received 5.2k indexed citations . Written by David Ron and Peter Walter covering the research area of Epidemiology, Cell Biology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cell Biology (3.6k citations), Molecular Biology (2.4k citations), Epidemiology (1.7k citations), Surgery (702 citations) and Physiology (546 citations). Published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nrm2199.