Zillah Watson
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Mel SlaterMichael A. EvansDeborah FoxCristina Gonzalez-LiencresCharlotte D. W. VinkersShivashankar HalanPatrick HaggardJeremy D. Silver
- Topics
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (6 papers)Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers)Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Human-Computer InteractionComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionLiterature and Literary Theory
- Journals
- Frontiers in Robotics and AISMPTE Motion Imaging JournalFrontiers in Virtual Reality
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Zillah Watson
9 papers receiving 424 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Human-Computer Interaction 327
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 149
- Social Psychology 73
- Literature and Literary Theory 70
- Cognitive Neuroscience 67
Countries citing papers authored by Zillah Watson
This map shows the geographic impact of Zillah Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zillah Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zillah Watson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zillah Watson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zillah Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zillah Watson. The network helps show where Zillah Watson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zillah Watson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zillah Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zillah Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zillah Watson. Zillah Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | The Ethics of Realism in Virtual and Augmented Realitybreakdown → | 237 |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 75 | |
| 9 | 9 |
About Zillah Watson
Zillah Watson is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sensory Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 9 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (6 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers) and Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (327 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (149 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (70 citations). Zillah Watson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mel Slater, Michael A. Evans, Deborah Fox, Cristina Gonzalez-Liencres, Charlotte D. W. Vinkers, Shivashankar Halan, Patrick Haggard, Jeremy D. Silver, William Steptoe and Dalila Szostak. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Robotics and AI, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal and Frontiers in Virtual Reality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.