William Latham

27 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

William Latham
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Architecture 31
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 61
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 177
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 30
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 104
Replace Oliver Bown with:
Oliver Bown Australia
Andy Hunt United Kingdom
Kouichi Utsumiya Japan
David Cope United States
John Chowning United States
Matthew Yee-King United Kingdom
Ross Kirk United Kingdom
Jônatas Manzolli Brazil
João Correia Portugal
Damián Keller Brazil
William Latham relative to Oliver Bown Australia Oliver Bown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Oliver Bown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Latham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Latham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Latham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Latham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Latham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Latham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Latham. The network helps show where William Latham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Latham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Latham Line = papers co-authored together William Latham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Evolutionary Art and Computers
1992230
2 202118
3 198916
4 202214
5 202014
6 202013
7 20219
8 20139
9 20138
10 20178
11 20147
12 19916
13 20195
14 20245
15 19694
16 20154
17 19893
18
Evaluating the Initial Teaching Alphabet : a study of the influence of English orthography on learning to read and write
19672
19 20212
20 20152

About William Latham

William Latham is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (4 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (31 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (61 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (177 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (30 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (104 citations). William Latham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Todd, Frédéric Fol Leymarie, Peter Todd, Takaya Arita, Mohammad Majid al‐Rifaie, Yasutaka Kakui, Reiji Suzuki, Mark Huckvale, Jennifer Downing and Simon J. McGowan. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, IBM Systems Journal, Computer Graphics Forum, British Journal of Educational Psychology and Journal of Research in Reading.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact