Xiaokai Yang

1.7k citations
61 papers · 823 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaokai Yang

48 papers receiving 678 citations

Peers

Xiaokai Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 289
  • Economics and Econometrics 633
  • Accounting 64
  • Strategy and Management 83
  • Development 19
Replace Arnold Heertje with:
Arnold Heertje Netherlands
Reto Foellmi Switzerland
Erasmo Papagni Italy
Richard G. Harris Canada
Aristomène Varoudakis France
Jens J. Krüger Germany
F.A.G. den Butter Netherlands
Larry Willmore Austria
Bernardo S. Blum Canada
Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud Switzerland
Xiaokai Yang relative to Arnold Heertje Netherlands Arnold Heertje's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Arnold Heertje · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaokai Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaokai Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaokai Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaokai Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaokai Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaokai Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaokai Yang. The network helps show where Xiaokai Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Xiaokai Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaokai Yang Line = papers co-authored together Xiaokai Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20054
4 20031
5 200310
6
Economic Development and the Division of Labor
200336
7 20021
8 20021
9 20024
10 20013
11 20004
12
Economics: New Classical Versus Neoclassical Frameworks
200081
13 200012
14 200015
15
Policies to Reduce Unemployment
19981
16
Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity: Comment
199389
17 199012
18 19901
19 199023
20
A microeconomic approach to modeling the division of labor based on increasing returns to specialization
198820

About Xiaokai Yang

Xiaokai Yang is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Toxicology and Development, having authored 61 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (24 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (20 papers), Global trade and economics (16 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (7 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (6 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (6 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers) and Merger and Competition Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (289 citations), Economics and Econometrics (633 citations), Accounting (64 citations), Strategy and Management (83 citations) and Development (19 citations). Xiaokai Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Jeff Borland, Ben J. Heijdra, Yew‐Kwang Ng, Jeffrey D. Sachs, Wenli Cheng, Robert C. Rice, Guang‐Zhen Sun, Wing Thye Woo, Pak-Wai Liu and Lin Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as China Economic Review, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Economics, Pacific Economic Review and Review of Development Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026