Reto Foellmi
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Finance top 10%
- Accounting top 10%
- Co-authors
- Josef ZweimüllerManuel OechslinGiuseppe BertolaKlaus Reiner Schenk–HoppéAdrian V. JaeggiLukas SchmidPeter Egger
- Topics
- Economic theories and models (21 papers)Economic Theory and Policy (12 papers)Economic Growth and Productivity (11 papers)
- Cited by
- General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEconomics and EconometricsGeneral Decision Sciences
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Reto Foellmi
38 papers receiving 801 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Economics and Econometrics 712
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 282
- Sociology and Political Science 198
- Finance 70
- Accounting 57
Countries citing papers authored by Reto Foellmi
This map shows the geographic impact of Reto Foellmi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reto Foellmi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reto Foellmi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Reto Foellmi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reto Foellmi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reto Foellmi. The network helps show where Reto Foellmi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Reto Foellmi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Reto Foellmi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Reto Foellmi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Reto Foellmi. Reto Foellmi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | Market Imperfections, Wealth Inequality, and the Distribution of Trade Gains | 2 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 182 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 123 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Consumption Structure and Macroeconomics: Structural Change and the Relationship Between Inequality and Growth | 2 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Reto Foellmi
Reto Foellmi is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, General Decision Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (21 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (12 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (282 citations), Economics and Econometrics (712 citations) and General Decision Sciences (42 citations). Reto Foellmi has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Josef Zweimüller, Manuel Oechslin, Giuseppe Bertola, Klaus Reiner Schenk–Hoppé, Adrian V. Jaeggi, Lukas Schmid and Peter Egger. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, The Review of Economics and Statistics and The Review of Economic Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.