Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Economic Geography and Public Policy
2011328 citationsGianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud et al.Princeton University Press eBooksprofile →
Productive Cities: Sorting, Selection, and Agglomeration
2014264 citationsKristian Behrens, Gilles Duranton et al.Journal of Political Economyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud. The network helps show where Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud. Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kerr, William R. & Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud. (2020). Tech Clusters. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 34(3). 50–76.59 indexed citations
Albouy, David, Kristian Behrens, Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud, & Nathan Seegert. (2016). The Optimal Distribution of Population Across Cities. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
4.
Robert‐Nicoud, Frédéric, et al.. (2015). Trade and frictional unemployment in the global economy. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.13 indexed citations
Behrens, Kristian & Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud. (2009). The 100 dollar bill on the sidewalk is gone and the 2008 Nobel Prize well-deserved. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).2 indexed citations
Hilber, Christian A. L. & Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud. (2007). Homeownership and land use controls: a dynamic model with voting and lobbying. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
13.
Robert‐Nicoud, Frédéric. (2006). Off-Shoring of Business Services and Deindustrialization: Threat Or Opportunity - and for Whom?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).3 indexed citations
Baldwin, Richard & Frédéric Robert‐Nicoud. (2001). Free Trade Agreements without Delocation. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.