Lin Zhou

3.3k citations
90 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Lin Zhou

87 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Lin Zhou
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • General Decision Sciences 144
  • Management Science and Operations Research 678
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.5k
  • Transportation 270
  • Urban Studies 105
Replace Christopher F. Parmeter with:
Christopher F. Parmeter United States
Thomas M. Stoker United States
Aman Ullah United States
Graham Elliott United States
Alex Anas United States
Eduardo Ley United States
P. A. V. B. Swamy United States
Anindya Banerjee United Kingdom
Ivan Savin Russia
Alexander Teytelboym United Kingdom
Lin Zhou relative to Christopher F. Parmeter United States Christopher F. Parmeter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Christopher F. Parmeter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lin Zhou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lin Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lin Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lin Zhou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lin Zhou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lin Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lin Zhou. The network helps show where Lin Zhou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lin Zhou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lin Zhou Line = papers co-authored together Lin Zhou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991202
2 2021152
3 1990135
4 2021117
5 201897
6 201887
7 199477
8 199474
9 199166
10 202063
11 201963
12 201962
13 199153
14 199751
15 202249
16 200247
17 202142
18 202039
19 202139
20 199934

About Lin Zhou

Lin Zhou is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Transportation, Global and Planetary Change and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (26 papers), Economic theories and models (19 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (12 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (8 papers), Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (8 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (7 papers), Game Theory and Applications (7 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (144 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (678 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.5k citations), Transportation (270 citations) and Urban Studies (105 citations). Lin Zhou has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jianshuang Fan, Hugo Sonnenschein, Salvador Barberà, Miao Ma, Shuai Shao, Yan Zhang, Chenjing Fan, Deyi Hou, Stephen Ching and Li Tian. Their work appears in journals such as Land Use Policy, Games and Economic Behavior, Econometrica, Economic Theory and Journal of Economic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact