Wu‐jing He

521 citations
23 papers · 346 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Wu‐jing He

22 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Wu‐jing He
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 261
  • Social Psychology 98
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 86
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 19
  • Music 11
Replace Wan‐chi Wong with:
Wan‐chi Wong Hong Kong
Jeb S. Puryear United States
Jiajun Guo China
Aleksandra Zielińska Poland
Ewa Wiśniewska Poland
Sareh Karami United States
Mônica Souza Neves-Pereira Brazil
Abdullah Aljughaiman Saudi Arabia
Xinfa Yi China
Zayda Sierra Colombia
Wu‐jing He relative to Wan‐chi Wong Hong Kong Wan‐chi Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Wan‐chi Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wu‐jing He

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wu‐jing He's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wu‐jing He with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wu‐jing He more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wu‐jing He

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wu‐jing He. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wu‐jing He. The network helps show where Wu‐jing He may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Wu‐jing He, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wu‐jing He Line = papers co-authored together Wu‐jing He links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201176
2 202144
3 202139
4 201734
5 201327
6 201521
7 201820
8 202314
9 202213
10 201711
11 20147
12 20226
13 20236
14 20246
15 20245
16 20224
17 20244
18 20243
19 20253
20 20241

About Wu‐jing He

Wu‐jing He is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Education, having authored 23 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (18 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (12 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (7 papers), Mind wandering and attention (5 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (5 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (261 citations), Social Psychology (98 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (19 citations) and Music (11 citations). Wu‐jing He has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Wan‐chi Wong, Anna N. N. Hui, Yin Li, Mei‐ki Chan and Kai Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Thinking Skills and Creativity, Personality and Individual Differences, The Journal of Creative Behavior and Journal of Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact