Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Expected Value of Control: An Integrative Theory of Anterior Cingulate Cortex Function
20131.5k citationsAmitai Shenhav, Matthew Botvinick et al.Neuronprofile →
Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort
2017619 citationsAmitai Shenhav, Sebastian Musslick et al.profile →
The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued
2018441 citationsAmitai Shenhav et al.Trends in Cognitive Sciencesprofile →
Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control
2016384 citationsAmitai Shenhav, Jonathan D. Cohen et al.profile →
Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God.
Countries citing papers authored by Amitai Shenhav
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Amitai Shenhav's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amitai Shenhav with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amitai Shenhav more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amitai Shenhav. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amitai Shenhav. The network helps show where Amitai Shenhav may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amitai Shenhav
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amitai Shenhav.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amitai Shenhav based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amitai Shenhav. Amitai Shenhav is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ritz, Harrison, et al.. (2020). An evidence accumulation model of motivational and developmental influences over sustained attention.. Cognitive Science.1 indexed citations
10.
Ritz, Harrison & Amitai Shenhav. (2019). Parametric control of distractor-oriented attention.. Cognitive Science. 967–973.3 indexed citations
Musslick, Sebastian, Jonathan D. Cohen, & Amitai Shenhav. (2019). Decomposing Individual Differences in Cognitive Control: A Model-Based Approach.. Cognitive Science. 2427–2433.9 indexed citations
13.
Spitzer, Markus, Sebastian Musslick, Michael Shvartsman, Amitai Shenhav, & Jonathan D. Cohen. (2019). Asymmetric Switch Costs as a Function of Task Strength.. Cognitive Science. 1070–1076.6 indexed citations
14.
Grahek, Ivan, Amitai Shenhav, Sebastian Musslick, Ruth M. Krebs, & Ernst H. W. Koster. (2019). Motivation and cognitive control in depression. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 102. 371–381.196 indexed citations
Musslick, Sebastian, Seong J. Jang, Michael Shvartsman, Amitai Shenhav, & Jonathan D. Cohen. (2018). Constraints associated with cognitive control and the stability-flexibility dilemma.. Cognitive Science.21 indexed citations
19.
Musslick, Sebastian, Jonathan D. Cohen, & Amitai Shenhav. (2018). Estimating the costs of cognitive control from task performance: theoretical validation and potential pitfalls.. Cognitive Science.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.