Woldemar Görler

466 citations
15 papers · 29 indexed · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 1
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 3

Woldemar Görler

8 papers receiving 19 citations

Peers

Woldemar Görler
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
  • Classics 8
  • Anthropology 21
  • Philosophy 11
  • Archeology 9
  • Literature and Literary Theory 5
Replace Emanuele Narducci with:
Emanuele Narducci
Propertius Sextus Propertius
Marcus Cornelius Fronto
Annette Harder Netherlands
Ewen Bowie United Kingdom
A. S. Gratwick United Kingdom
Fabio Stok Italy
J. Cook Wilson United Kingdom
A. E. Housman United States
Bill Gladhill Canada
Woldemar Görler relative to Emanuele Narducci Emanuele Narducci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Emanuele Narducci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Woldemar Görler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Woldemar Görler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Woldemar Görler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Woldemar Görler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Woldemar Görler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Woldemar Görler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Woldemar Görler. The network helps show where Woldemar Görler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Woldemar Görler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Woldemar Görler Line = papers co-authored together Woldemar Görler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
For a Skeptical Peripatetic: Festschrift in Honour of John Glucker
20170
2
WEIHE UND ENTRUCKUNG DER LOCKE DER BERENIKE
20161
3 20150
4 20150
5 20112
6 20085
7 20040
8 20031
9
Die Philosophie der Antike. Band4: Die hellenistische Philosophie
19961
10
Pratum Saraviense : Festgabe für Peter Steinmetz
19903
11 198812
12 19761
13
Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Philosophie
19741
14 19732
15 19610

About Woldemar Görler

Woldemar Görler is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology, Classics, Archeology and History, having authored 15 papers that have together received 29 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (2 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (1 paper), Historical and Archaeological Studies (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (8 citations), Anthropology (21 citations), Philosophy (11 citations), Archeology (9 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (5 citations). Woldemar Görler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jan Opsomer, Jaap Mansfeld, John M. Dillon, Harold Tarrant, Keimpe Algra, Hellmut Flashar, André Laks, Anna Maria Ioppolo, Jill Kraye and Dorothea Frede. Their work appears in journals such as Mnemosyne, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Antike und Abendland, POETICA and Philologus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026