Anna Maria Ioppolo

476 citations
13 papers · 59 indexed · h-index 6
Topics
Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers)
Partner nations
ItalyFrance

In The Last Decade

Anna Maria Ioppolo

9 papers receiving 51 citations

Peers

Anna Maria Ioppolo
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
  • Philosophy 46
  • Anthropology 38
  • Archeology 29
  • Surgery 4
  • Classics 4
Replace François Lissarrague with:
François Lissarrague France
Emanuele Narducci
Markus Asper Germany
Tara S. Welch United States
Ewen Bowie United Kingdom
Heinrich Dörrie United States
Antonina Alberti United States
Woldemar Görler Germany
Nita Krevans United States
Propertius Sextus Propertius
Anna Maria Ioppolo relative to François Lissarrague France François Lissarrague's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
François Lissarrague · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Maria Ioppolo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Maria Ioppolo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Maria Ioppolo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Maria Ioppolo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Maria Ioppolo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Maria Ioppolo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Maria Ioppolo. The network helps show where Anna Maria Ioppolo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Maria Ioppolo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Maria Ioppolo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Maria Ioppolo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Maria Ioppolo. Anna Maria Ioppolo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2
For a Skeptical Peripatetic: Festschrift in Honour of John Glucker
0
3
SESTO EMPIRICO E L’ACCADEMIA SCETTICA
0
4 0
5
La testimonianza di sesto empirico sull'accademia scettica
5
6 1
7 0
8 6
9 12
10
Logica, Mente E Persona Studi Sulla Filosofia Antica
3
11
Opinione e scienza : il dibattito tra Stoici e Accademici nel III e nel II secolo a. C.
7
12 5
13
Aristone di Chio e lo stoicismo antico
15

About Anna Maria Ioppolo

Anna Maria Ioppolo is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology and Archeology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 59 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (46 citations), Anthropology (38 citations) and Archeology (29 citations). Anna Maria Ioppolo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Barnes, Antonina Alberti, Christopher Kirwan, Jill Kraye, Tiziano Dorandi, Malcolm Schofield, Jan Opsomer, Philippe Garot, Jaap Mansfeld and John M. Dillon. Their work appears in journals such as Phronesis, ˜The œJournal of invasive cardiology and Méthexis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026