Fabio Stok
Impact in
-
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
- Medieval Literature and History
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
- Classics 7
- Byzantine Studies and History 5
- Medieval Literature and History 2
- Co-authors
- Richard HunterSander M. GoldbergMary R. LefkowitzMonica R. GaleSimon GoldhillElisa RomanoCasper C. de Jonge
- Journals
- International Journal of the Classical Tradition (2 papers)Dead Sea Discoveries (1 paper)Euphrosyne (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2 papers)Gesnerus (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Fabio Stok
7 papers receiving 18 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
- Classics 5
- Anthropology 13
- History 7
- Philosophy 7
- Literature and Literary Theory 5
Countries citing papers authored by Fabio Stok
This map shows the geographic impact of Fabio Stok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fabio Stok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabio Stok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fabio Stok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fabio Stok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fabio Stok. The network helps show where Fabio Stok may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Fabio Stok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | Strategie ciceroniane fra storiografia e retorica | 2021 | 0 |
| 3 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 10 | Strategie freudiane: cultura classica e psicoanalisi | 2010 | 0 |
| 11 | Cicero De republica | 2010 | 3 |
| 12 | Medicus amicus: la filosofia al servizio della medicina | 2009 | 1 |
| 13 | Servio: stratificazioni esegetiche e modelli culturali. Servius: Exegetical Stratifications and Cultural Models | 2008 | 5 |
| 14 | Hinc Italae gentes. Geopolitica ed etnografia dell'Italia nel Commento di Servio all'Eneide | 2004 | 1 |
| 15 | Servio e la geopolitica della guerra italica | 2004 | 1 |
| 16 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 17 | La discreta fortuna delle "Naturales quaestiones" | 2000 | 1 |
| 18 | Retorica ed etimologia nei trattati di Celio Aureliano | 2000 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 8 |
About Fabio Stok
Fabio Stok is a scholar working on Classics, General Arts and Humanities, History, Archeology and Anthropology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 25 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (5 citations), Anthropology (13 citations), History (7 citations), Philosophy (7 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (5 citations). Fabio Stok has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Hunter, Sander M. Goldberg, Mary R. Lefkowitz, Monica R. Gale, Simon Goldhill, Elisa Romano and Casper C. de Jonge. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of the Classical Tradition, Dead Sea Discoveries, Euphrosyne, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gesnerus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.