POETICA
- Fields
- Classics (56 papers)Literature and Literary Theory (84 papers)Language and Linguistics (65 papers)
- Topics
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural StudiesGerman Literature and Culture StudiesLinguistic research and analysis
In The Last Decade
POETICA
88 papers receiving 158 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Literature and Literary Theory 207
- Anthropology 128
- Language and Linguistics 120
- Classics 117
- Philosophy 89
Countries where authors publish in POETICA
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in POETICA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in POETICA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites POETICA more than expected).
Fields of papers published in POETICA
This network shows the impact of papers published in POETICA. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in POETICA.
About POETICA
The 489 papers published in POETICA in the last decades have received a total of 633 indexed citations . Papers published in POETICA usually cover Classics (56 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (84 papers) and Language and Linguistics (65 papers) specifically the topics of Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (49 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (49 papers) and Linguistic research and analysis (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in POETICA are Monika Fludernik, Eugenio Coseriu, Jan-Dirk Müller, Werner Wolf, Karlheinz Stierle, Hans Robert Jauß, Siegfried J. Schmidt, Peter Hühn, Rüdiger Schnell and Mary Carruthers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.