Wing‐Yee Cheung

47 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Wing‐Yee Cheung
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Gender Studies 617
  • Social Psychology 1.2k
  • Literature and Literary Theory 432
  • Applied Psychology 121
  • Marketing 210
Replace Nicholas D. Theodorakis with:
Nicholas D. Theodorakis United States
Knud S. Larsen United States
Pilar Carrera Spain
Toby Miller United States
Nicole Kronberger Austria
Thomas W. Cline United States
Jaideep Sengupta Hong Kong
Phillip J. Bowman United States
Jesse G. Delia United States
Wing‐Yee Cheung relative to Nicholas D. Theodorakis United States Nicholas D. Theodorakis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.9×
Nicholas D. Theodorakis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wing‐Yee Cheung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wing‐Yee Cheung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing‐Yee Cheung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing‐Yee Cheung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wing‐Yee Cheung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing‐Yee Cheung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing‐Yee Cheung. The network helps show where Wing‐Yee Cheung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wing‐Yee Cheung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wing‐Yee Cheung Line = papers co-authored together Wing‐Yee Cheung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003326
2 2009248
3 2013228
4 2016179
5 2014155
6 1993142
7 2014115
8 2015106
9 202079
10 201774
11 199169
12 201568
13 201565
14 201964
15 199360
16 201060
17 199860
18 199756
19 199450
20
Sarcoidosis: a long-term follow up study.
200047

About Wing‐Yee Cheung

Wing‐Yee Cheung is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior (15 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Media Influence and Health (6 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers), Social and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (4 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (617 citations), Social Psychology (1.2k citations), Literature and Literary Theory (432 citations), Applied Psychology (121 citations) and Marketing (210 citations). Wing‐Yee Cheung has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tim Wildschut, Constantine Sedikides, Benoit Landry, A.J.J.M. Vingerhoets, Gregory R. Maio, Erica G. Hepper, Jamie Arndt, Ali Pakizeh, Clay Routledge and Nicole Tausch. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact