Wing S. Chow
- Strategy and Management top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Management Information Systems top 0.5%
- Information Systems and Management top 0.5%
- Communication top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Lai Sheung ChanSi ShiYang ChenAndrew KusiakChristian N. MaduChu‐Hua KueiChinho LinSaggi Nevo
- Topics
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (13 papers)Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (10 papers)Quality and Supply Management (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
Wing S. Chow
50 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Strategy and Management 1.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 905
- Management Information Systems 845
- Information Systems and Management 784
- Communication 700
Countries citing papers authored by Wing S. Chow
This map shows the geographic impact of Wing S. Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing S. Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing S. Chow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wing S. Chow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing S. Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing S. Chow. The network helps show where Wing S. Chow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wing S. Chow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wing S. Chow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wing S. Chow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wing S. Chow. Wing S. Chow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 91 | |
| 2 | 91 | |
| 3 | 93 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 110 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | Intended Belief and Actual Behavior in Green Computing in Hong Kong | 74 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Cluster analysis program for group technology | 1 |
About Wing S. Chow
Wing S. Chow is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 50 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (13 papers), Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (10 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (784 citations), Communication (700 citations) and Management Information Systems (845 citations). Wing S. Chow has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Lai Sheung Chan, Si Shi, Yang Chen, Andrew Kusiak, Christian N. Madu, Chu‐Hua Kuei, Chinho Lin, Saggi Nevo, Yi Wang and Jiafei Jin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, European Journal of Operational Research and Journal of Business Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.