William W. Li
Impact in
- Infectious Diseases top 0.5%
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 24
- Co-authors
- Vincent W. LiMaximilian AckermannDanny JonigkFlorian LaengerArno VanstapelStijn E. VerledenHelge StarkTobias Welte
- Journals
- International Wound Journal (12 papers)The Journal of Pathology (2 papers)Wound Repair and Regeneration (2 papers)Advances in Skin & Wound Care (2 papers)The Lancet (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
William W. Li
52 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Infectious Diseases 2.5k
- Rehabilitation 806
- Internal Medicine 399
- Neurology 1.5k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 328
Countries citing papers authored by William W. Li
This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Li. The network helps show where William W. Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William W. Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 8 | A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effects of noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound to standard care in healing venous leg ulcers. | 2015 | 26 |
| 9 | 2014 | 58 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 137 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 46 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 14 | Imiquimod as an antiangiogenic agent. | 2005 | 64 |
| 15 | 2005 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 88 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 336 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 203 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 66 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 107 |
About William W. Li
William W. Li is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Urology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 6.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (24 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (14 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (14 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (14 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (7 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (4 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (3 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (2.5k citations), Rehabilitation (806 citations), Internal Medicine (399 citations), Neurology (1.5k citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (328 citations). William W. Li has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Vincent W. Li, Maximilian Ackermann, Danny Jonigk, Florian Laenger, Arno Vanstapel, Stijn E. Verleden, Helge Stark, Tobias Welte, Mark Kuehnel and Christopher Werlein. Their work appears in journals such as International Wound Journal, The Journal of Pathology, Wound Repair and Regeneration, Advances in Skin & Wound Care and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.