Andrew Chang
- Ophthalmology top 0.2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 10%
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Thomas HongGeoffrey BroadheadMeidong ZhuTien CheyPhilip B. MitchellWayne SmithKimberly SpoonerPaul Beaumont
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (82 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (52 papers)Retinal and Optic Conditions (39 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of NeurochemistryOphthalmology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew Chang
109 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Ophthalmology 2.2k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.7k
- Molecular Biology 424
- Neurology 166
- Oncology 104
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Chang
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Chang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Chang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Chang. The network helps show where Andrew Chang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Chang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Chang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Chang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Chang. Andrew Chang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 69 | |
| 14 | Comparison of aflibercept treatment regimes for treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 8 weekly versus an ‘as-needed’ regime | 1 |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | EVALUATION OF A DIRECT APPROACH TO EYE DONATION IN A POPULATION WITH RETINAL DISEASES | 1 |
| 17 | Retinal Morphology Changes Following Intravitreal Aflibercept for Treatment-Resistant Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration | 1 |
| 18 | Visual outcomes of ranibizumab treatment in fellow eyes of exudative AMD | 1 |
| 19 | 87 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Andrew Chang
Andrew Chang is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 116 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (82 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (52 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (39 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (2.2k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.7k citations) and Neurology (166 citations). Andrew Chang has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Hong, Geoffrey Broadhead, Meidong Zhu, Tien Chey, Philip B. Mitchell, Wayne Smith, Kimberly Spooner, Paul Beaumont, Bobak Bahrami and Timothy E. Schlub. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Neurochemistry and Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.