Wound Repair and Regeneration

2.5k papers and 95.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Wound Repair and Regeneration in the last decades have received a total of 95.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Wound Repair and Regeneration usually cover Rehabilitation (1.7k papers), Surgery (769 papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (445 papers) specifically the topics of Wound Healing and Treatments (1.7k papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (438 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (437 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wound Repair and Regeneration are Gregory S. Schultz, Marjana Tomic‐Canic, Chandan K. Sen, Olivera Stojadinović, Harold Brem, Stephan Barrientos, Vincent Falanga, Michael S. Golinko, Martin C. Robson and A. B. G. Lansdown.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Wound Repair and Regeneration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Wound Repair and Regeneration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wound Repair and Regeneration.

Countries where authors publish in Wound Repair and Regeneration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wound Repair and Regeneration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wound Repair and Regeneration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wound Repair and Regeneration more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025