William W. Falk

1.1k citations
57 papers · 818 indexed · h-index 16

William W. Falk

54 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers

William W. Falk
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Sociology and Political Science 491
  • Economics and Econometrics 168
  • General Health Professions 164
  • Education 120
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90
Replace Cynthia M. Duncan with:
Cynthia M. Duncan United States
Sophie Bowlby United Kingdom
Simon Pemberton United Kingdom
John Isbister United States
Nici Nelson United Kingdom
Suzanne Keller United States
Karen Brock India
Nick Buck United Kingdom
Devaki Jain India
I. H. Burnley Australia
William W. Falk relative to Cynthia M. Duncan United States Cynthia M. Duncan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cynthia M. Duncan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William W. Falk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Falk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Falk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Falk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Falk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Falk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Falk. The network helps show where William W. Falk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William W. Falk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William W. Falk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William W. Falk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William W. Falk. William W. Falk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 0
3 41
4 27
5
Review of The Decomposition of Sociology. Irving Louis Horowitz. Reviewed by William W. Falk, University of Maryland.
4
6 13
7 1
8
Rural labor markets
1
9
Introduction: perspectives on rural labor markets
1
10
Bringing Rural Sociology Back In.
7
11
Determinants of earnings of farm families in the U.S
12
12 15
13 2
14 1
15 4
16 8
17 2
18 17
19
Making Sense of the Concept Rural and Doing Rural Sociology: An Interpretive Perspective.
32
20 2

About William W. Falk

William W. Falk is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies, having authored 57 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (12 papers), School Choice and Performance (5 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (74 citations), Sociology and Political Science (491 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (90 citations). William W. Falk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Lyson, Matthew O. Hunt, Larry L. Hunt, Bruce Rankin, Diane K. McLaughlin, Cynthia M. Duncan, Thomas K. Pinhey, David R. Segal, Mady Wechsler Segal and Ann R. Tickamyer. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Frontiers in Immunology and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026