Michael D. Grimes

733 total citations
26 papers, 477 citations indexed

About

Michael D. Grimes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael D. Grimes has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 477 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Michael D. Grimes's work include Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers). Michael D. Grimes is often cited by papers focused on Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers). Michael D. Grimes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Philippines. Michael D. Grimes's co-authors include Thomas K. Pinhey, Henry D. Jacoby, Charles M. Bonjean, George D. Lowe, Gary L. Hansen, Roland J. Liebert, Robert L. Lineberry, Allen W. Imershein, Shirley Laska and Daphne Spain and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and Social Forces.

In The Last Decade

Michael D. Grimes

25 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael D. Grimes United States	11	227	85	75	57	50	26	477
Stephen Cotgrove United Kingdom	13	250 1.1×	89 1.0×	84 1.1×	27 0.5×	57 1.1×	32	571
Paul Blumberg United States	8	192 0.8×	16 0.2×	58 0.8×	36 0.6×	39 0.8×	15	497
Richard M. Coughlin United States	12	228 1.0×	28 0.3×	195 2.6×	22 0.4×	101 2.0×	22	530
Jane Jacobs	8	200 0.9×	18 0.2×	62 0.8×	19 0.3×	42 0.8×	21	476
Stephen Crook Australia	7	199 0.9×	33 0.4×	61 0.8×	28 0.5×	14 0.3×	12	386
Carl Gersuny United States	9	256 1.1×	11 0.1×	124 1.7×	25 0.4×	23 0.5×	32	505
Garth Massey United States	12	381 1.7×	40 0.5×	186 2.5×	58 1.0×	39 0.8×	26	636
Yael Yishai Israel	10	287 1.3×	13 0.2×	147 2.0×	39 0.7×	31 0.6×	41	517
Andrew McLaughlin United Kingdom	9	141 0.6×	15 0.2×	206 2.7×	30 0.5×	30 0.6×	19	481
Erwin C. Hargrove United States	12	125 0.6×	21 0.2×	220 2.9×	14 0.2×	62 1.2×	47	533

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Grimes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Grimes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Grimes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Grimes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Grimes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Grimes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Grimes. The network helps show where Michael D. Grimes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael D. Grimes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael D. Grimes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael D. Grimes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael D. Grimes. Michael D. Grimes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Teeple, Gary, et al.. (1999). Caught in the Middle: Contradictions in the Lives of Sociologists from Working-Class Backgrounds. Labour / Le Travail. 43. 280–280. 1 indexed citations

Gottdiener, Mark, et al.. (1998). Caught in the Middle: Contradictions in the Lives of Sociologists from Working-Class Backgrounds. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 27(5). 470–470. 8 indexed citations

Grimes, Michael D., et al.. (1997). Caught in the Middle. Praeger eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Mann, Susan, et al.. (1997). Paradigm Shifts in Family Sociology? Evidence From Three Decades of Family Textbooks. Journal of Family Issues. 18(3). 315–349. 12 indexed citations

Grimes, Michael D., et al.. (1996). Class, Self-Perception, and Racial Group Identification Among African Americans. Critical Sociology. 22(1). 73–91. 4 indexed citations

Macy, Michael W. & Michael D. Grimes. (1992). Class in Twentieth-Century American Sociology: An Analysis of Theories and Measurement Strategies.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 21(3). 333–333. 2 indexed citations

Grimes, Michael D.. (1989). Class and Attitudes Toward Structural Inequalities: An Empirical Comparison of Key Variables in Neo- and Post-Marxist Scholarship. Sociological Quarterly. 30(3). 441–463. 9 indexed citations

Grimes, Michael D.. (1988). The Functionalist Perspective on Social Inequality: Some Neglected Theoretical and Conceptual Roots*. Sociological Inquiry. 58(2). 182–193. 1 indexed citations

Grimes, Michael D., et al.. (1984). Critical Issues in the Analysis of Social, Economic, and Cultural Impacts of Energy Extraction and Development of Local Areas. Community Development Society Journal. 15(1). 45–58. 1 indexed citations

10.

Grimes, Michael D. & Gary L. Hansen. (1984). Response bias in sex-role attitude measurement. Sex Roles. 10(1-2). 67–72. 11 indexed citations

11.

Falk, William W., et al.. (1982). Professionalism and Conflict in a Bureaucratic Setting: The Case of a Teachers' Strike. Social Problems. 29(5). 551–560. 2 indexed citations

12.

Grimes, Michael D., et al.. (1981). Neighborhoods that Work: Sources for Viability in the Inner City.. Social Forces. 60(1). 258–258. 19 indexed citations

13.

Lowe, George D., Thomas K. Pinhey, & Michael D. Grimes. (1980). Public Support for Environmental Protection: New Evidence from National Surveys. The Pacific Sociological Review. 23(4). 423–445. 79 indexed citations

14.

Pinhey, Thomas K., Michael D. Grimes, & Alvin L. Bertrand. (1979). The opinions and attitudes of Louisiana's Coastal Zone residents toward outdoor recreational development: A perspective for planning and management. Coastal Zone Management Journal. 5(1-2). 131–143. 1 indexed citations

15.

Grimes, Michael D., Roland J. Liebert, & Allen W. Imershein. (1979). Power, Paradigms, and Community Research.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 8(2). 290–290. 14 indexed citations

16.

Grimes, Michael D., et al.. (1978). The Bureaucratization of the World.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 7(4). 459–459. 97 indexed citations

17.

Grimes, Michael D. & Thomas K. Pinhey. (1976). Recreation potential of private lands in Louisiana's coastal zone. 2 indexed citations

18.

Bonjean, Charles M. & Michael D. Grimes. (1971). Some Issues in the Study of Bureaucracy and Alienation. Social Forces. 49(4). 622–630. 1 indexed citations

19.

Bonjean, Charles M. & Michael D. Grimes. (1971). Some Issues in the Study of Bureaucracy and Alienation. Social Forces. 49(4). 622–622. 1 indexed citations

20.

Bonjean, Charles M. & Michael D. Grimes. (1970). Bureaucracy and Alienation: A Dimensional Approach. Social Forces. 48(3). 365–373. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact