Simon Pemberton
- Urban Studies top 2%
- Urban Planning and Governance 5
-
- Rural development and sustainability 6
-
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 8
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 4
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 4
- Public Administration top 10%
-
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 4
-
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 9
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 9
- Co-authors
- Christina PantazisMark GoodwinBill EdwardsMichael WoodsEldin FahmyEileen SuttonKaren BellJanice Morphet
- Journals
- Planning Practice and Research (3 papers)The British Journal of Criminology (3 papers)European Planning Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Simon Pemberton
46 papers receiving 924 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Urban Studies 105
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127
- Sociology and Political Science 591
- Public Administration 44
- Political Science and International Relations 257
Countries citing papers authored by Simon Pemberton
This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Pemberton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Pemberton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Pemberton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Pemberton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Pemberton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Pemberton. The network helps show where Simon Pemberton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Pemberton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 7 | Life on a low income in austere times | 2014 | 5 |
| 8 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 248 | |
| 14 | Criminal obsessions: Why harm matters more than crime | 2008 | 37 |
| 15 | Criminal Obsessions: Why Harm Matters More Than Crime (2nd ed.) | 2008 | 2 |
| 16 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 1 |
About Simon Pemberton
Simon Pemberton is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Finance and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (9 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (8 papers), Rural development and sustainability (6 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (5 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (105 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (127 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (591 citations). Simon Pemberton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Christina Pantazis, Mark Goodwin, Bill Edwards, Michael Woods, Eldin Fahmy, Eileen Sutton, Karen Bell, Janice Morphet, Steve Tombs and Lisa Scullion. Their work appears in journals such as Planning Practice and Research, The British Journal of Criminology, European Planning Studies, Policy & Politics and Urban Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.