William S. Verplanck

993 total citations
29 papers, 747 citations indexed

About

William S. Verplanck is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, William S. Verplanck has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 747 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in William S. Verplanck's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (2 papers). William S. Verplanck is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (2 papers). William S. Verplanck collaborates with scholars based in United States. William S. Verplanck's co-authors include John R. Hayes, John W. Cotton, George Collier, William C. Wilson, Donald S. Blough, W. K. Estes, Paul E. Meehl, Stephen J. Anderson, Conrad G. Mueller and Sigmund Koch and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Psychological Review and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

In The Last Decade

William S. Verplanck

28 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William S. Verplanck United States	14	282	237	107	95	62	29	747
Kenneth MacCorquodale United States	10	269 1.0×	289 1.2×	134 1.3×	53 0.6×	86 1.4×	12	785
Bruce M. Ross United States	15	171 0.6×	194 0.8×	122 1.1×	42 0.4×	172 2.8×	52	835
Milton A. Trapold United States	15	485 1.7×	325 1.4×	140 1.3×	40 0.4×	82 1.3×	38	958
Gregory Razran United States	12	190 0.7×	337 1.4×	151 1.4×	114 1.2×	178 2.9×	35	850
Douglas H. Lawrence United States	14	220 0.8×	331 1.4×	144 1.3×	28 0.3×	154 2.5×	24	862
Lynae Wyckoff United States	10	406 1.4×	203 0.9×	80 0.7×	36 0.4×	55 0.9×	20	766
Karl A. Minke United States	9	206 0.7×	182 0.8×	139 1.3×	112 1.2×	79 1.3×	16	504
H. N. Peters United States	9	479 1.7×	273 1.2×	127 1.2×	201 2.1×	71 1.1×	16	870
James G. Holland United States	15	727 2.6×	379 1.6×	139 1.3×	114 1.2×	64 1.0×	38	1.1k
C. T. Morgan United Kingdom	5	182 0.6×	368 1.6×	120 1.1×	31 0.3×	117 1.9×	5	608

Countries citing papers authored by William S. Verplanck

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Verplanck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Verplanck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Verplanck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Verplanck

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Verplanck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Verplanck. The network helps show where William S. Verplanck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Verplanck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Verplanck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Verplanck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Verplanck. William S. Verplanck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Verplanck, William S.. (1996). From 1924 to 1996, and into the future: operation analytic behaviorism. CogPrints (University of Southampton). 22(3). 19–60. 1 indexed citations

Verplanck, William S.. (1992). A brief introduction to The Word Associate Test. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior. 10(1). 97–123. 4 indexed citations

Verplanck, William S.. (1992). Verbal concept “mediators” as simple operants. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior. 10(1). 45–68. 46 indexed citations

Verplanck, William S., et al.. (1986). The Imagery Questionnaire: An Investigation of its Validity. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 63(2). 915–920. 20 indexed citations

Verplanck, William S.. (1984). The egg revealed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 7(4). 605–606. 1 indexed citations

Anderson, Stephen J. & William S. Verplanck. (1983). When walls speak, what do they say?. The Psychological Record. 8 indexed citations

Verplanck, William S.. (1971). Further Overstatements of a Phenomenological Behaviorist. The Psychological Record. 21(4). 481–486. 3 indexed citations

Verplanck, William S.. (1970). An “Overstatement” on Psychological Research: What is a Dissertation?. The Psychological Record. 20(1). 119–122. 9 indexed citations

Verplanck, William S.. (1962). Unaware of where's awareness: Some verbal operants-notates, monents, and notants. Journal of Personality. 30(3). 130–158. 42 indexed citations

10.

Collier, George & William S. Verplanck. (1958). Nonindependence of successive responses at the visual threshold as a function of interpolated stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 55(5). 429–437. 18 indexed citations

11.

Verplanck, William S. & Donald S. Blough. (1958). Randomized Stimuli and the Non-Independence of Successive Responses at the Visual Threshold. The Journal of General Psychology. 59(2). 263–272. 12 indexed citations

12.

Verplanck, William S.. (1956). The operant conditioning of human motor behavior.. Psychological Bulletin. 53(1). 70–83. 46 indexed citations

13.

Cotton, John W. & William S. Verplanck. (1955). The Dependence of Frequencies of Seeing on Procedural Variables: III. The Time-Interval Between Successive Stimuli. The Journal of General Psychology. 53(1). 59–66. 3 indexed citations

14.

Cotton, John W. & William S. Verplanck. (1955). The Dependence of Frequencies of Seeing on Procedural Variables: II. Procedure of Terminating Series of Intensity-Ordered Stimuli. The Journal of General Psychology. 53(1). 49–57. 5 indexed citations

15.

Verplanck, William S.. (1955). Since learned behavior is innate, and vice versa, what now?. Psychological Review. 62(2). 139–144. 18 indexed citations

16.

Verplanck, William S. & Donald S. Blough. (1955). An Apparatus for the Presentation of Visual Stimuli at Low Intensities. The Journal of General Psychology. 53(1). 67–77. 1 indexed citations

17.

Estes, W. K., Sigmund Koch, Kenneth MacCorquodale, et al.. (1954). Modern learning theory: A critical analysis of five examples.. Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks. 20 indexed citations

18.

Verplanck, William S., John W. Cotton, & George Collier. (1953). Previous training as a determinant of response dependency at the threshold.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 46(1). 10–14. 21 indexed citations

19.

Verplanck, William S. & John R. Hayes. (1953). Eating and drinking as a function of maintenance schedule.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 46(5). 327–333. 133 indexed citations

20.

Verplanck, William S., George Collier, & John W. Cotton. (1952). Nonindependence of successive responses in measurements of the visual threshold.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 44(4). 273–282. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact