William R. Kennedy
- Physiology top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gwen Wendelschafer‐CrabbXavier NavarroMilton AlterJoo Ho SungDavid E.R. SutherlandTimothy JohnsonMaria NolanoDonald A. Simone
- Topics
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (35 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (24 papers)Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainItaly
In The Last Decade
William R. Kennedy
191 papers receiving 8.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
- Physiology 3.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.2k
- Neurology 2.1k
- Surgery 2.0k
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by William R. Kennedy
This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Kennedy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Kennedy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Kennedy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Kennedy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Kennedy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Kennedy. The network helps show where William R. Kennedy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Kennedy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Kennedy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Kennedy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Kennedy. William R. Kennedy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 78 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | 105 | |
| 12 | 63 | |
| 13 | 62 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 77 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | Attitudes of Kent State Students Before and After the Events of May 4, 1970. | 0 |
| 20 | 34 |
About William R. Kennedy
William R. Kennedy is a scholar working on Neurology, Pharmaceutical Science and Transplantation, having authored 201 papers that have together received 9.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (35 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (24 papers) and Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (773 citations), Neurology (2.1k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.2k citations). William R. Kennedy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Gwen Wendelschafer‐Crabb, Xavier Navarro, Milton Alter, Joo Ho Sung, David E.R. Sutherland, Timothy Johnson, Maria Nolano, Donald A. Simone, Frederick C. Goetz and John S. Najarian. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.