William R. Folks

662 citations
32 papers · 456 indexed · h-index 12

William R. Folks

29 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

William R. Folks
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 75
  • Communication 71
  • Accounting 94
  • Finance 54
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 79
Replace Anne Tomes with:
Anne Tomes United Kingdom
Richard Eccleston Australia
Daejeong Choi Australia
Andrew Stewart Australia
Sarah Houghton-Walker United Kingdom
Berend van der Kolk Netherlands
Yamin Zhang China
Paul Strebel United States
Tehreem Fatima Pakistan
Lanying Huang Taiwan
William R. Folks relative to Anne Tomes United Kingdom Anne Tomes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Anne Tomes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William R. Folks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Folks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Folks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Folks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Folks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Folks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Folks. The network helps show where William R. Folks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William R. Folks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William R. Folks Line = papers co-authored together William R. Folks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20187
2 200822
3
Characterizing Infrared Frequency Selective Surfaces On Dispersive Media
200710
4 20070
5 200712
6 20078
7 20045
8 20001
9 199984
10
The Socialization of Expatriate Interns.
199815
11 199717
12 199511
13 19942
14
International dimensions of financial management
19886
15 19871
16
The impact of statement of financial accounting standards no. 8 on the foreign exchange risk management practices of American multinationals : an economic impact study
197825
17 19781
18 19750
19 19736
20 19723

About William R. Folks

William R. Folks is a scholar working on Accounting, Communication and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 32 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (6 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (4 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (3 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Terahertz technology and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (75 citations), Communication (71 citations) and Accounting (94 citations). William R. Folks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Chuck C.Y. Kwok, William H. Turnley, Daniel C. Feldman, Jeffrey S. Arpan, Glenn D. Boreman, Oleg D. Lavrentovich, Yu. Reznikov, David Shelton, James C. Ginn and Stanley R. Stansell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026