William M. Lamont

509 total citations
14 papers, 174 citations indexed

About

William M. Lamont is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, William M. Lamont has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 174 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in History, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in William M. Lamont's work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper). William M. Lamont is often cited by papers focused on Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper). William M. Lamont collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Mexico. William M. Lamont's co-authors include Richard Schlatter, Paul S. Seaver, John F. Wilson and James R. Jacob and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, Past & Present and Eighteenth-Century Studies.

In The Last Decade

William M. Lamont

12 papers receiving 86 citations

Peers

William M. Lamont
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • History 106
  • Political Science and International Relations 91
  • Sociology and Political Science 47
  • Economics and Econometrics 26
  • Religious studies 16
Replace Leo F. Solt with:
Leo F. Solt United States
Derek Beales United Kingdom
Corinne Comstock Weston United States
Bob Scribner United Kingdom
Reed Browning United States
J. E. Neale United States
William Lamont United Kingdom
Robert Zaller United States
Ralph E. Giesey United States
Elizabeth Read Foster United States
Leo F. Solt United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to William M. Lamont
William M. Lamont · 1×
Citations per year, relative to William M. Lamont
William M. Lamont · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Lamont

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Lamont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Lamont

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Lamont. The network helps show where William M. Lamont may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. Lamont

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. Lamont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. Lamont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. Lamont. William M. Lamont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Puritanism and historical controversy
8
2 0
3 13
4
Richard Baxter and the Millennium
16
5
Politics, Religion and Literature in the Seventeenth Century
1
6
The Realities of teaching history: Beginnings
4
7 21
8 3
9
Godly Rule: Politics and Religion, 1603-60
44
10 42
11 4
12 1
13
Marginal Prynne, 1600-1669
13
14 4

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026