J. E. Neale
Impact in
Papers in
- History 6
- Scottish History and National Identity 4
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 2
-
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 3
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)The Yale Law Journal (1 paper)Shakespeare Quarterly (1 paper)Doubleday eBooks (1 paper)ResearchSPAce (Bath Spa University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
J. E. Neale
10 papers receiving 101 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- History 114
- Museology 14
- Political Science and International Relations 71
- Economics and Econometrics 56
- Literature and Literary Theory 20
Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Neale
This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Neale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Neale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Neale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Neale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Neale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Neale. The network helps show where J. E. Neale may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside J. E. Neale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1954 | 59 | |
| 2 | 1958 | 56 | |
| 3 | Elizabeth I and her Parliaments | 1958 | 39 |
| 4 | Essays in Elizabethan history | 1958 | 18 |
| 5 | Queen Elizabeth I : a biography | 1957 | 5 |
| 6 | 1959 | 4 | |
| 7 | The age of Catherine de Medici | 1957 | 3 |
| 8 | The Quenes Maiesties Passage Through The Citie Of London To Westminster The Day Before Her Coronacion | 1960 | 3 |
| 9 | The Age of Catherine de Medici : and essays in Elizabethan history | 1963 | 1 |
| 10 | 1959 | 1 | |
| 11 | Afghanistan: the case against 'the good war' | 2008 | 1 |
| 12 | Elizabethan government and society : essays presented to Sir John Neale | 1961 | 0 |
About J. E. Neale
J. E. Neale is a scholar working on History, Museology, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (1 paper) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (114 citations), Museology (14 citations), Political Science and International Relations (71 citations), Economics and Econometrics (56 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations). J. E. Neale has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Conyers Read and J. Marshall Osborn. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Yale Law Journal, Shakespeare Quarterly, Doubleday eBooks and ResearchSPAce (Bath Spa University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.