Richard Schlatter
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- History top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- John SekoraKarl Joachim WeintraubMaurice DobbÉmile JamesLawrence StoneChristopher HillG. E. AylmerRobert Eccleshall
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers)Australian History and Society (2 papers)Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Richard Schlatter
21 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Sociology and Political Science 136
- Political Science and International Relations 127
- History 92
- Economics and Econometrics 75
- Philosophy 65
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Schlatter
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Schlatter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Schlatter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Schlatter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Schlatter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Schlatter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Schlatter. The network helps show where Richard Schlatter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Schlatter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Schlatter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Schlatter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Schlatter. Richard Schlatter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philosophy, Science and Higher Education | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Recent views on British history : essays on historical writing since 1966 | 1 |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 94 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 120 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | Richard Baxter & Puritan politics | 0 |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Richard Schlatter
Richard Schlatter is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and History, having authored 25 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers) and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (92 citations), Philosophy (65 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (127 citations). Richard Schlatter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Sekora, Karl Joachim Weintraub, Maurice Dobb, Émile James, Lawrence Stone, Christopher Hill, G. E. Aylmer, Robert Eccleshall, William M. Lamont and Thucydides. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Higher Education and Economica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.