William M. Chace

635 citations
28 papers · 193 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Modernist Literature and Criticism (4 papers)Samuel Beckett and Modernism (3 papers)Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

William M. Chace

18 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers

William M. Chace
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Education 64
  • Sociology and Political Science 63
  • Political Science and International Relations 39
  • Literature and Literary Theory 32
  • Philosophy 18
Replace Douwe Fokkema with:
Douwe Fokkema Netherlands
J. Garry Clifford United States
Frank Donoghue United States
Nick Peim United Kingdom
Mark Cousins United States
Stephen Regan United Kingdom
Nesta Devine New Zealand
Rhonda Hammer United States
Sarah Robbins United States
A. Bartlett Giamatti United States
William M. Chace relative to Douwe Fokkema Netherlands Douwe Fokkema's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Douwe Fokkema · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Chace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Chace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Chace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Chace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Chace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Chace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Chace. The network helps show where William M. Chace may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. Chace

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. Chace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. Chace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. Chace. William M. Chace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 1
3 0
4 0
5 3
6 1
7 0
8 0
9
How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment (review)
0
10 28
11 7
12 2
13
An introduction to literature
1
14 1
15
Joyce : a collection of critical essays
1
16 10
17
The political identities of Ezra Pound & T. S. Eliot
6
18
Justice Denied: The Black Man in White America.
0
19 1
20 3

About William M. Chace

William M. Chace is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Speech and Hearing and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 28 papers that have together received 193 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Modernist Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Samuel Beckett and Modernism (3 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and Education (64 citations). William M. Chace has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter Sutton, Peter Collier, J. Paul Hunter, John Donaldson and Jennifer A. Marshall Graves. Their work appears in journals such as Operations Research, College Composition and Communication and American Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026