William L. Sherman
- Anthropology top 5%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Demography top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael C. MeyerLinda A. NewsonCharles GibsonPeter GerhardC. Michael GibsonRichard E. GreenleafWilliam TaylorPeggy K. Liss
- Topics
- Latin American history and culture (13 papers)Historical Studies in Latin America (8 papers)Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewHispanic American Historical ReviewThe American Indian Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United StatesHondurasCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
William L. Sherman
27 papers receiving 215 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Anthropology 98
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 80
- Sociology and Political Science 80
- Demography 80
- Political Science and International Relations 63
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Sherman
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Sherman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Sherman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Sherman. The network helps show where William L. Sherman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Sherman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Sherman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Sherman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Sherman. William L. Sherman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Measure By Measure | 1 |
| 2 | Progressive Era Rural Reform: Creating Standard Schools in the Midwest. | 3 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Indian slavery in Spanish Guatemala, 1524-1550 | 1 |
About William L. Sherman
William L. Sherman is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Anthropology and Demography, having authored 31 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Latin American history and culture (13 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (8 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (80 citations), Anthropology (98 citations) and Cultural Studies (59 citations). William L. Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Honduras and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Meyer, Linda A. Newson, Charles Gibson, Peter Gerhard, C. Michael Gibson, Richard E. Greenleaf, William Taylor, Peggy K. Liss, Wendy Kramer and Paul Theobald. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Hispanic American Historical Review and The American Indian Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.