Wendy Kramer

1.6k total citations
35 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Wendy Kramer is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Wendy Kramer has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 21 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 10 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Wendy Kramer's work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (28 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (20 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (6 papers). Wendy Kramer is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Technologies (28 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (20 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (6 papers). Wendy Kramer collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Wendy Kramer's co-authors include Vasanti Jadva, Susan Golombok, T. Freeman, Rosanna Hertz, Margaret K. Nelson, Diane Beeson, Tabitha Freeman, Jennifer Schneider, Neroli Sawyer and Lucy Frith and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Wendy Kramer

33 papers receiving 975 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wendy Kramer United States 17 956 551 261 200 182 35 1.0k
Ken Daniels New Zealand 20 1.1k 1.1× 703 1.3× 222 0.9× 202 1.0× 274 1.5× 48 1.1k
Marilyn Crawshaw United Kingdom 19 866 0.9× 596 1.1× 462 1.8× 136 0.7× 133 0.7× 56 1.1k
T. Freeman United Kingdom 9 488 0.5× 290 0.5× 102 0.4× 102 0.5× 130 0.7× 12 544
Tabitha Freeman United Kingdom 14 469 0.5× 266 0.5× 93 0.4× 87 0.4× 159 0.9× 18 558
Anne Brewaeys Netherlands 17 1.3k 1.3× 671 1.2× 137 0.5× 228 1.1× 645 3.5× 23 1.5k
Petra Nordqvist United Kingdom 15 562 0.6× 152 0.3× 81 0.3× 193 1.0× 101 0.6× 31 654
Susan Imrie United Kingdom 14 377 0.4× 222 0.4× 72 0.3× 78 0.4× 200 1.1× 28 553
E. Blyth United Kingdom 13 429 0.4× 279 0.5× 131 0.5× 83 0.4× 91 0.5× 25 512
Sophie Zadeh United Kingdom 15 333 0.3× 156 0.3× 54 0.2× 101 0.5× 135 0.7× 30 503
Zeynep B. Gürtin United Kingdom 12 412 0.4× 155 0.3× 155 0.6× 131 0.7× 57 0.3× 18 492

Countries citing papers authored by Wendy Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wendy Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wendy Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wendy Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wendy Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wendy Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wendy Kramer. The network helps show where Wendy Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wendy Kramer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wendy Kramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wendy Kramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wendy Kramer. Wendy Kramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Koenig, Mary Dawn, Crystal L. Patil, Alana Steffen, et al.. (2025). Oocyte donors’ physical outcomes and psychosocial experiences: a mixed-methods study. Fertility and Sterility. 124(1). 95–103. 1 indexed citations
2.
Schneider, Jennifer, et al.. (2017). Long-term breast cancer risk following ovarian stimulation in young egg donors: a call for follow-up, research and informed consent. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 34(5). 480–485. 17 indexed citations
3.
Jadva, Vasanti, Tabitha Freeman, Miriam Steele, et al.. (2016). Integrating donor conception into identity development: adolescents in fatherless families. Fertility and Sterility. 106(1). 202–208. 47 indexed citations
4.
Hertz, Rosanna, Margaret K. Nelson, & Wendy Kramer. (2015). Gendering gametes: The unequal contributions of sperm and egg donors. Social Science & Medicine. 147. 10–19. 10 indexed citations
5.
Crawshaw, Marilyn, Ken Daniels, Damian Adams, et al.. (2015). Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion. PubMed. 1(2). 71–80. 29 indexed citations
6.
Daniels, Ken & Wendy Kramer. (2013). Genetic and health issues emerging from sperm donation—The experiences and views of donors. 1(3). 15–20. 6 indexed citations
7.
Sawyer, Neroli, Eric Blyth, Wendy Kramer, & Lucy Frith. (2013). A survey of 1700 women who formed their families using donor spermatozoa. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 27(4). 436–447. 29 indexed citations
8.
Beeson, Diane, et al.. (2013). A New Path to Grandparenthood. Journal of Family Issues. 34(10). 1295–1316. 11 indexed citations
9.
Hertz, Rosanna, Margaret K. Nelson, & Wendy Kramer. (2013). Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: The relevance of age, awareness, and family form. Social Science & Medicine. 86. 52–65. 54 indexed citations
10.
Frith, Lucy, Neroli Sawyer, & Wendy Kramer. (2012). Forming a family with sperm donation: a survey of 244 non-biological parents. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 24(7). 709–718. 23 indexed citations
11.
Stephenson, John, Eric Blyth, Wendy Kramer, & Jennifer Schneider. (2012). Donor type and parental disclosure following oocyte donation. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. 1(1). 42–47. 6 indexed citations
12.
Beeson, Diane, et al.. (2011). Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Human Reproduction. 26(9). 2415–2424. 111 indexed citations
13.
Kramer, Wendy. (2010). The case for comprehensive medical testing of gamete donors. 22. 1 indexed citations
14.
Jadva, Vasanti, Tabitha Freeman, Wendy Kramer, & Susan Golombok. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 20(4). 523–532. 129 indexed citations
15.
Jadva, Vasanti, T. Freeman, Wendy Kramer, & Susan Golombok. (2010). Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction. 26(3). 638–645. 83 indexed citations
16.
Kramer, Wendy, et al.. (2009). US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues. Human Reproduction. 24(12). 3144–3149. 35 indexed citations
17.
Jadva, Vasanti, T. Freeman, Wendy Kramer, & Susan Golombok. (2009). The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction. 24(8). 1909–1919. 158 indexed citations
18.
Onwulata, Charles I., et al.. (2008). Global opportunities in agri-food science & technology. Food technology. 62(11). 40–47. 2 indexed citations
19.
Freeman, T., Vasanti Jadva, Wendy Kramer, & Susan Golombok. (2008). Gamete donation: parents' experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor. Human Reproduction. 24(3). 505–516. 116 indexed citations
20.
Puhl, Alexander, et al.. (2008). Fetal Urogenital Sinus with Consecutive Hydrometrocolpos because of Labial Fusion: Prenatal Diagnostic Difficulties and Postpartal Therapeutic Management. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 23(4). 287–292. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026