Citations per year, relative to William H. Page William H. Page (= 1×)
peers
Damien Neven
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Page
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Page's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Page with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Page more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Page. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Page. The network helps show where William H. Page may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Page
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Page.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Page based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Page. William H. Page is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Page, William H.. (2020). Direct Evidence of a Sherman Act Agreement. UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida).
2.
Page, William H.. (2015). Signaling and Agreement Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. SSRN Electronic Journal. 0–0.
3.
Page, William H.. (2012). Standard Oil and U.S. Steel : Predation and Collusion in the Law of Monopolization and Mergers. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
4.
Page, William H.. (2009). Antitrust, Federalism, and the Regulatory Process: A Reconstruction and Critique of the State Action Exemption after Midcal Aluminum. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Page, William H.. (2009). Legal Realism and the Shaping of Modern Antitrust. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
6.
Page, William H.. (2009). The Gary Dinners and the Meaning of Concerted Action. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University).9 indexed citations
7.
Page, William H.. (2009). Mandatory Contracting Remedies in the American and European Microsoft Cases. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
8.
Page, William H.. (2008). Facilitating Practices and Concerted Action Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Page, William H., et al.. (2007). Software Development as an Antitrust Remedy: Lessons from the Enforcement of the Microsoft Communications Protocol Licensing Requirement. eYLS (Yale Law School). 14(1). 77–136.4 indexed citations
10.
Page, William H., et al.. (2007). The Microsoft Case.3 indexed citations
11.
Page, William H.. (2006). Communication and Concerted Action. Loyola University of Chicago law journal. 38(3). 405.2 indexed citations
12.
Page, William H.. (2005). The Ideological Origins and Evolution of U.S. Antitrust Law. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
13.
Page, William H., et al.. (2003). State Action and the Meaning of Agreement Under Sherman Act: An Approach to Hybrid Restraints. Yale journal on regulation. 20(2). 3.1 indexed citations
14.
Page, William H., et al.. (2001). Monopolization, Innovation, and Consumer Welfare. UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida).2 indexed citations
15.
Page, William H.. (1999). The Limits of State Indirect Purchaser Suits: Class Certification in the Shadow of Illinois Brick. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
16.
Page, William H.. (1999). Antitrust Review of Mergers in Transition Economies: A Comment, with Some Lessons from Brazil. SSRN Electronic Journal.
17.
Page, William H.. (1996). Proving antitrust damages : legal and economic issues.17 indexed citations
18.
Blair, Roger D. & William H. Page. (1995). "Speculative" Antitrust Damages. Washington law review. 70(2). 423.7 indexed citations
19.
Page, William H., et al.. (1995). Posner's Program for the Antitrust Division: A Twenty-Five Year Perspective. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 48(5). 1713.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.