Pınar Akman

430 total citations
37 papers, 157 citations indexed

About

Pınar Akman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Pınar Akman has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 157 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 14 papers in Strategy and Management and 14 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in Pınar Akman's work include Merger and Competition Analysis (21 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (10 papers) and EU Law and Policy Analysis (9 papers). Pınar Akman is often cited by papers focused on Merger and Competition Analysis (21 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (10 papers) and EU Law and Policy Analysis (9 papers). Pınar Akman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Spain. Pınar Akman's co-authors include Hussein Kassim, D. Daniel Sokol, Morten Hviid, John R. Hamilton, Mathias Siems, Vito Mollica, Gerhard Schnyder, Priya Lele, Massimo Motta and Chiara Fumagalli and has published in prestigious journals such as JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, Review of Industrial Organization and Journal of Law and Society.

In The Last Decade

Pınar Akman

29 papers receiving 150 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pınar Akman United Kingdom 7 81 76 45 36 35 37 157
Brenda Sufrin United Kingdom 5 51 0.6× 55 0.7× 42 0.9× 48 1.3× 16 0.5× 10 132
Heike Schweitzer Germany 7 65 0.8× 52 0.7× 41 0.9× 49 1.4× 11 0.3× 43 143
Pablo Ibáñez Colomo United Kingdom 7 64 0.8× 59 0.8× 66 1.5× 55 1.5× 11 0.3× 59 150
Valentine Korah United Kingdom 6 40 0.5× 85 1.1× 41 0.9× 49 1.4× 18 0.5× 39 139
Damien Neven Switzerland 5 65 0.8× 127 1.7× 20 0.4× 24 0.7× 63 1.8× 10 161
Vanessa Mak Netherlands 7 53 0.7× 29 0.4× 60 1.3× 34 0.9× 18 0.5× 53 154
Evelyne Terryn Belgium 7 70 0.9× 22 0.3× 77 1.7× 39 1.1× 23 0.7× 32 158
Thomas F. Cotter United States 9 21 0.3× 158 2.1× 27 0.6× 20 0.6× 22 0.6× 67 236
Annette Kur Germany 8 56 0.7× 35 0.5× 139 3.1× 60 1.7× 85 2.4× 96 248
Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan Germany 7 39 0.5× 39 0.5× 31 0.7× 58 1.6× 12 0.3× 45 150

Countries citing papers authored by Pınar Akman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pınar Akman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pınar Akman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pınar Akman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pınar Akman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pınar Akman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pınar Akman. The network helps show where Pınar Akman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pınar Akman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pınar Akman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pınar Akman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pınar Akman. Pınar Akman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Akman, Pınar, Massimo Motta, & Chiara Fumagalli. (2024). Reflections on the European Commission’s Draft Guidelines on Exclusionary Abuses. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
2.
Akman, Pınar. (2024). A Critical Inquiry into ‘Abuse’ in EU Competition Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 44(2). 405–433.
3.
4.
5.
Akman, Pınar. (2019). Online Platforms, Agency, and Competition Law: Mind the Gap. Fordham international law journal. 43(2). 209. 5 indexed citations
6.
Akman, Pınar. (2019). Competition Policy in a Globalized, Digitalized Economy (World Economic Forum, White Paper). White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).
7.
Akman, Pınar. (2019). An Agenda for Competition Law and Policy in the Digital Economy. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 10(10). 589–590. 2 indexed citations
8.
Akman, Pınar. (2017). A Preliminary Assessment of the European Commission's Google Android Decision. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 2 indexed citations
9.
Akman, Pınar. (2016). The Reform of the Application of Article 102 TFEU: Mission Accomplished?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
10.
Akman, Pınar. (2016). A COMPETITION LAW ASSESSMENT OF PLATFORM MOST-FAVORED-CUSTOMER CLAUSES. Journal of Competition Law & Economics. 8 indexed citations
11.
Akman, Pınar & D. Daniel Sokol. (2016). Online RPM and MFN Under Antitrust Law and Economics. Review of Industrial Organization. 50(2). 133–151. 10 indexed citations
12.
Akman, Pınar. (2014). The role of intent in the EU case Law on abuse of dominance. European Law Review. 316–337.
13.
Akman, Pınar, et al.. (2010). When are Excessive Prices Unfair?. SSRN Electronic Journal.
14.
Akman, Pınar & Hussein Kassim. (2009). Myths and Myth‐Making in the European Union: The Institutionalization and Interpretation of EU Competition Policy*. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies. 48(1). 111–132. 27 indexed citations
15.
Akman, Pınar. (2008). Exploitative Abuse in Article 82EC: Back to Basics?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
16.
Akman, Pınar. (2008). 'Consumer Welfare' and Article 82EC: Practice and Rhetoric. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
17.
Akman, Pınar. (2006). To Abuse, or not to Abuse: Discrimination between Consumers. European Law Review. 32(4). 492–512. 2 indexed citations
18.
Hviid, Morten & Pınar Akman. (2006). A Most-Favoured-Customer Guarantee with a Twist. SSRN Electronic Journal.
19.
Akman, Pınar. (2006). Article 82 Reformed? The EC Discussion Paper on Exclusionary Abuses. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 2006(8). 816–829. 1 indexed citations
20.
Akman, Pınar. (2006). To Abuse, or not to Abuse: Discrimination between Consumers. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brenda Sufrin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heike Schweitzer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pablo Ibáñez Colomo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Valentine Korah Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Damien Neven Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vanessa Mak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Evelyne Terryn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas F. Cotter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annette Kur Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan
Rankless by CCL
2026