William Greenslade

559 total citations
3 papers, 102 citations indexed

About

William Greenslade is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, William Greenslade has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 102 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 0 papers in Infectious Diseases and 0 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in William Greenslade's work include Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (1 paper). William Greenslade is often cited by papers focused on Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (1 paper). William Greenslade collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. William Greenslade's co-authors include John Stokes, Shearer West, Stephen Arata, Sally Ledger, Ross G. Forman, Margaret D. Stetz, Gail Marshall, Jenny Bourne Taylor and Marion Thain and has published in prestigious journals such as ELH, Cambridge University Press eBooks and The Yearbook of English Studies.

In The Last Decade

William Greenslade

3 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers

William Greenslade
Pamela Clemit United Kingdom
Richard A. Cardwell United Kingdom
Merlin Holland South Africa
Martin Stannard United Kingdom
Ricardo Gullón United States
Gerhart Hoffmeister United States
Pamela Clemit United Kingdom
William Greenslade
Citations per year, relative to William Greenslade William Greenslade (= 1×) peers Pamela Clemit

Countries citing papers authored by William Greenslade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Greenslade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Greenslade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Greenslade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Greenslade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Greenslade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Greenslade. The network helps show where William Greenslade may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Greenslade

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Greenslade. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Greenslade based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Greenslade. William Greenslade is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
1.
Marshall, Gail, Jenny Bourne Taylor, William Greenslade, et al.. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to the Fin de Siècle. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 13 indexed citations
2.
Greenslade, William, et al.. (1996). Degeneration, Culture and the Novel, 1880-1940. The Yearbook of English Studies. 26. 297–297. 82 indexed citations
3.
Greenslade, William. (1982). The Power of Advertising: Chad Newsome and the Meaning of Paris in the Ambassadors. ELH. 49(1). 99–99. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026