John Stokes

1.8k citations
91 papers · 696 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John Stokes

67 papers receiving 509 citations

Peers

John Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 205
  • Literature and Literary Theory 124
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 81
  • Automotive Engineering 108
  • Computational Mechanics 160
Replace Klaus Mollenhauer with:
Klaus Mollenhauer Germany
Peter Lloyd Jones United Kingdom
Mark Driscoll Canada
Mark Anderson United States
George D. Catalano United States
K.J. Rawson United States
T. Maxwell United States
Andrew Harrison United States
Peter Thomson Colombia
Marianne Stowell Bracke United States
John Stokes relative to Klaus Mollenhauer Germany Klaus Mollenhauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Klaus Mollenhauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stokes. The network helps show where John Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Stokes Line = papers co-authored together John Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004135
2 199748
3 198939
4 200132
5 201632
6 201127
7 201726
8 199620
9 201818
10
In the nineties
198917
11 201616
12 199215
13 200713
14 198512
15 198212
16 201712
17 200810
18 198910
19
Reflecting the audience - London theatregoing, 1840-1880
20029
20 19939

About John Stokes

John Stokes is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 91 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (9 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (8 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (6 papers), Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization (6 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (6 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (5 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (205 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (124 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (81 citations), Automotive Engineering (108 citations) and Computational Mechanics (160 citations). John Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Osborne, T. H. Lake, Andreas Schamel, Linda Dowling, Stefano Spaccapietra, Zahir Tari, Steven Begg, Martin Gold, Robert G. Lockie and Ashley J. Orjalo. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Sports, The Spine Journal and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact