William G. Powers
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- William J. JordanBryan ByersGraham D. BodieKevin HutchinsonRichard L. StreetMichael D. ScottAmber N. FinnD. W. Koerner
- Topics
- Communication in Education and Healthcare (13 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers)EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
William G. Powers
37 papers receiving 378 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Social Psychology 195
- Education 105
- Sociology and Political Science 90
- Language and Linguistics 83
- General Health Professions 78
Countries citing papers authored by William G. Powers
This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Powers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Powers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Powers. The network helps show where William G. Powers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Powers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Powers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Powers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Powers. William G. Powers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | Overcoming Resistance to Instructional Technology. | 2 |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | Parent-child sexual discussion: perceived communicator style and subsequent behavior. | 70 |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | La comunicación interpersonal como necesidad | 2 |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | The Effects of Prior Computer Exposure On Man-Machine Computer Anxiety. | 18 |
About William G. Powers
William G. Powers is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (13 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (195 citations), Language and Linguistics (83 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (66 citations). William G. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include William J. Jordan, Bryan Byers, Graham D. Bodie, Kevin Hutchinson, Richard L. Street, Michael D. Scott, Amber N. Finn, D. W. Koerner, Brian H. Spitzberg and James M. Honeycutt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Human Communication Research and Journal of Criminal Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.