Michael D. Scott

3.5k citations
92 papers · 2.7k indexed · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Michael D. Scott

88 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Michael D. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Rehabilitation 541
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 809
  • Dermatology 389
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 494
  • Occupational Therapy 118
Replace Lee Stoner with:
Lee Stoner United States
B. Benjamin Australia
Christina Andersson Sweden
Svetlana Solovieva Finland
Alexandro Andrade Brazil
Oxana Palesh United States
Susan Martin United States
Karen Beattie Canada
Linda T. Miller Canada
Christer Malm Sweden
Michael D. Scott relative to Lee Stoner United States Lee Stoner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29.9×
Lee Stoner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Scott. The network helps show where Michael D. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20215
3 20213
4 201835
5 201714
6 20116
7 201115
8 200914
9 200844
10 200834
11 20088
12
Tort Liability for Vendors of Insecure Software: Has the Time Finally Come?
200712
13 200761
14 200728
15 200657
16
Legal Aspects of Drug Testing
20053
17 200525
18
1979 Adventures in Antitrust: Some Justice Here, Some FTC There
20040
19 200428
20 19767

About Michael D. Scott

Michael D. Scott is a scholar working on Dermatology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Social Psychology, Rehabilitation and Applied Psychology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Skin Protection and Aging (22 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (18 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (18 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (15 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (13 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (541 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (809 citations), Dermatology (389 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (494 citations) and Occupational Therapy (118 citations). Michael D. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David B. Buller, Barbara J. Walkosz, Peter E. Andersen, Lawrence R. Wheeless, Gary Cutter, Jon F. Nussbaum, Alan Sillars, Susan J. Harkema, Rodney H. Adkins and Michael Saulino. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the International Communication Association, Communication Education, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair and American Journal of Health Promotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026