William G. Doty
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Health top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- David M. WulffJulie Thompson KleinDavid KellyErica CarterStephen ConwayChris TurnerJohn L. WhiteWilliam H. Newell
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers)Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthReligious studiesPhilosophy
- Journals
- Journal for the Scientific Study of ReligionReview of Religious ResearchThe Classical World
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
William G. Doty
25 papers receiving 535 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Sociology and Political Science 334
- Health 292
- Social Psychology 146
- Philosophy 98
- Education 96
Countries citing papers authored by William G. Doty
This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Doty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Doty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Doty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Doty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Doty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Doty. The network helps show where William G. Doty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Doty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Doty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Doty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Doty. William G. Doty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | Psychology of Religion: Classic and Contemporarybreakdown → | 357 |
| 5 | Mythical Trickster Figures | 9 |
| 6 | Interdisciplinary studies today | 37 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Mythical trickster figures : contours, contexts, and criticisms | 64 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Contemporary New Testament interpretation | 4 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About William G. Doty
William G. Doty is a scholar working on Religious studies, Literature and Literary Theory and Gender Studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (292 citations), Religious studies (53 citations) and Philosophy (98 citations). William G. Doty has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David M. Wulff, Julie Thompson Klein, David Kelly, Erica Carter, Stephen Conway, Chris Turner, John L. White, William H. Newell, Donald G. Miller and Robert A. Segal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Review of Religious Research and The Classical World.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.