William F. Pohl

24 total papers · 418 total citations
14 papers, 246 citations indexed

About

William F. Pohl is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Geometry and Topology. According to data from OpenAlex, William F. Pohl has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 246 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Applied Mathematics, 3 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Geometry and Topology. Recurrent topics in William F. Pohl's work include Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (3 papers), Mathematics and Applications (2 papers) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (2 papers). William F. Pohl is often cited by papers focused on Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (3 papers), Mathematics and Applications (2 papers) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (2 papers). William F. Pohl collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. William F. Pohl's co-authors include Thomas Banchoff, John A. Little, Nicolaas H. Kuiper, Gert–Martin Greuel, Walter D. Neumann, Hans Schönemann and Gerhard Pfister and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Inventiones mathematicae.

In The Last Decade

William F. Pohl

12 papers receiving 163 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
William F. Pohl	86	85	40	38	35	14	246
A. Sossinsky	102 1.2×	57 0.7×	68 1.7×	8 0.2×	58 1.7×	17	212
V. Arnold	145 1.7×	48 0.6×	72 1.8×	9 0.2×	39 1.1×	9	251
M. Meyer	69 0.8×	250 2.9×	34 0.8×	43 1.1×	23 0.7×	18	295
Lucas Hsu	131 1.5×	116 1.4×	67 1.7×	12 0.3×	24 0.7×	8	315
Volker Arnold	125 1.5×	43 0.5×	78 1.9×	4 0.1×	31 0.9×	19	226
H. D. Ursell	43 0.5×	39 0.5×	27 0.7×	12 0.3×	27 0.8×	12	161
Leonard S. Charlap	215 2.5×	74 0.9×	175 4.4×	8 0.2×	40 1.1×	10	309
L. C. Grove	115 1.3×	50 0.6×	115 2.9×	10 0.3×	61 1.7×	19	314
Italo Tamanini	66 0.8×	207 2.4×	65 1.6×	10 0.3×	145 4.1×	23	323
Czes Kosniowski	197 2.3×	50 0.6×	171 4.3×	8 0.2×	50 1.4×	26	331

Countries citing papers authored by William F. Pohl

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Pohl

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Pohl. The network helps show where William F. Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Pohl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Pohl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Pohl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Pohl. William F. Pohl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact